What type of problems in supply chain can be addressed by the selected typical problem?Compare similarities and differences of selected articles?Discuss the suitability of using the selected typical model in design/analysis of various supply chains?

Assessment 2 (Individual Assignment)
Step 1: Identify and Solve a Typical Problem
There are a number of typical models in the Operations Research field which can be applied to a wide range of
supply chain problems. Select one of the following typical models:
• Travelling Salesperson Problem (TSP)
• Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem (mTSP)
• Knapsack Problem
• Vehicle Routing Problems (VRP)
• Job Shop Scheduling
• Parallel Machine Scheduling
• Christmas lunch problem
• Newsvendor problem
• Pickup and delivery
• Travelling thief problem
• Eight queens problem
• Minimum Spanning Tree
• Hamiltonian path problem
1.1. Background:
• Provide a detailed explanation of the selected problem.
1.2. Model
• Provide typical mathematical model of the selected problem and clearly explain different aspects of the
model (e.g. decision variable, objective function, constraints, etc.)
1.3. Solving an Example
• Develop a mathematical model for a workable and reasonable size of the problem.
– For many typical problems, when size of the problem increases, it becomes NP-Hard. In other words,
your computer will not be able to solve it mathematically. Therefore, ‘workable and reasonable size’
here means that size of the selected problem should not be too small or too large.
• Solve the problem in Excel and transfer your solution to Word. It is required that details and steps of
getting the solution are provided in the Word document.
• Interpret the findings and discuss.
Step 2: LR on Application of Selected Typical Model in Design and Analysis of Supply Chain
• Identify at least 5 peer reviewed articles in which your selected typical problem has been employed to
address knowledge gaps in supply chain field.
– At least one of the selected articles should be published after 2010.
• Write a comprehensive literature review on the application of “your selected” typical model in design and
analysis of supply chain and address the following (but not limited to) points:
– What type of problems in supply chain can be addressed by the selected typical problem?
– Compare similarities and differences of selected articles.
– Discuss the suitability of using the selected typical model in design/analysis of various supply chains.
– What are the limitations of your selected typical problem?
– Undertaking any additional critical and/or content analysis on the application of selected typical
problem in design and analysis of supply chain is highly recommended.
1
Step 3: Summary of Findings
• A summary of findings regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the selected typical problem in design
and analysis of supply chain should be summarised in this section.
Note:
• From each article something unique should be explained in the report.
• Word limit: 2500 ± 500 words
• As a RMIT Business student, you are required to use the Harvard referencing system.
• The naming convention for both Word and Excel files is: ‘Student Number_Student Name’. Both Word
and Excel files should be uploaded to the Canvas.
Rubric:
The assignment report is marked based on the following rubric:
Criteria Description Weight
Background of Typical
Problem
Refer to the assignment
description
10%
Model Refer to the assignment
description
20%
Solving an Example Refer to the assignment
description
15%
Literature Review Refer to the assignment
description
40%
Summary of Findings Refer to the assignment
description
5%
Presentation Quality of writing, grammar,
citations, references, format
and structure of report,
captions, etc.
10%
2

Looking for Discount?

You'll get a high-quality service, that's for sure.

To welcome you, we give you a 15% discount on your All orders! use code - ESSAY15

Discount applies to orders from $30
©2020 EssayChronicles.com. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.