2.6.2 Evolution of French Nationalism: Interpretation of Sources. /55
In the following assignment you will clearly communicate your interpretation of three sources, and demonstrate how each source links to nationalism. You will also explain the relationship that exists among all three sources.
Refer to the exemplar on page 2.5.1 Source Interpretation of the Tennis Court Oath to
assist you with this assignment.
Assignment: Source Interpretation
Examine the following three sources and complete the assignment.
Source #1
!
The Storming of the Bastille July 14, 1789
Source #2
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen Approved by the National Assembly of France, August 26, 1789
The representatives of the French people have been organized as a National Assembly.
They believe that ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man lead to corrupt
governments.
Article 3. The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. No body or individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation.
Excerpt from The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen
Source #3
“ who then shall dare to say the Third Estate has not within itself all that is necessary for the formation of a complete nation? It is the strong and robust man who has one arm still shackled. If the privileged order should be abolished, the nation will be nothing less, but something more. Therefore what is the Third Estate? Everything; but an everything shackled and oppressed. What would it be without the privileged order? Everything, but an everything free and flourishing, Nothing can succeed without it, everything would be
infinitely better without the others.”
Excerpt from What is the Third Estate? By the Abbe Sieyes 1789
Part One: Planning (35 marks)
Interpretation of Sources:
Source #1:
1. Complete the planning chart below. (5 marks)
After you have examined the details of the source you will be better able to demonstrate your understanding of it and its links to nationalism.
2. What is the main idea reflected in the source? (2 marks)
3. How is the source connected to nationalism? ( 3 marks)
Question Answer
Who is the source about?
What
…. Is the source addressing?
When did it occur?
Where did it occur?
Why was the source created?
Source #2:
1. Complete the planning chart below. (5 marks)
After you have examined the details of the source you will be better able to demonstrate your understanding of it and its links to nationalism.
2. What is the main idea reflected in the source? (2marks)
3. How is the source connected to nationalism? (3 marks)
Source #3:
1. Complete the planning chart below. (5 marks)
Question Answer
Who
….is the source about?
What
…. Is the source addressing?
When
…. did it occur?
Where
….did it occur?
Why
…was the source created?
After you have examined the details of the source you will be better able to demonstrate your
understanding of it and its links to nationalism.
2. What is the main idea reflected in the source? (2 marks)
3. How is the source connected to nationalism? (3 marks)
Relationships among the three sources:
1. Compare and/or contrast the sources to demonstrate the relationship(s) that exist
among them. (5 marks)
Part Two: Interpretation and Relationships (20 marks)
Question Answer
Who
….is the source about?
What
…. Is the source addressing?
When
…. did it occur?
Where
….did it occur?
Why
…was the source created?
Now that you have completed the Planning stage of the assignment, complete the assignment
below. It should consist of several paragraphs. Be sure to write a concluding
paragraph on the relationship(s) among all three sources.
Reminders for Writing:
• Interpret each source
• Organize your response
• Proofread and edit your writing
Finished copy:
Your assignment will be graded according to the scoring criteria below.
Interpretation of Sources
(3×4=12)
Relationships
(6)
Communication (2)
Examine each source
Write a response in paragraph form in which you
• Interpret each source to demonstrate your understanding of how each source links to nationalism and
• Explain one or more relationships that exist among the three
sources
Excellent
Interpretation of the source is sophisticated, insightful, and precise, demonstrating
a perceptive understanding of links to nationalism.
4 The explanation of relationship(s) is perceptive and thorough.
6 Vocabulary is precise and deliberately chosen. Sentence structure is controlled and sophisticated; ideas are judiciously organized. Writing demonstrates skillful control of mechanics and grammar.
2 Proficient Interpretation of the source is sound, specific, and adept, demonstrating a sound understanding of links to nationalism.
3.2 The explanation of relationship(s) is capable and purposeful.
4.8 Vocabulary is appropriate and specific. Sentence structure is controlled and effective; ideas are purposely organized.
Writing demonstrates capable control of mechanics and grammar.
1.6 Satisfactory Interpretation of the source is adequate, straightforward, and conventional, demonstrating a
generalized understanding of links to nationalism.
2.4 The explanation of relationship(s) is adequate and straightforward.
3.6 Vocabulary is conventional and generalized. Sentence structure is controlled and straightforward; ideas are
adequately organized. Writing demonstrates basic control of mechanics and grammar.
1.2 Limited Interpretation of the source is incomplete, vague, and simplistic, demonstrating a confused understanding of links to nationalism.
1.6 The explanation of relationship(s) is superficial, incomplete, redundant, and of questionable accuracy.
2.4 Vocabulary is imprecise, simplistic, and/ or inappropriate. Sentence structure is awkward; ideas are organized
ineffectively. Writing demonstrates a faltering control of mechanics and grammar.
.8 Poor Interpretation of the source is scant, inaccurate, and irrelevant, demonstrating little or no understanding of links to nationalism.
.8 The explanation of relationship(s) is scant, illogical, and tangential.
1.2 Vocabulary is over-generalized and/or inaccurate. Sentence structure is uncontrolled; organization of ideas is
haphazard and/or lacking. Writing demonstrates a profound lack of control of mechanics and grammar.
.4 Zero Zero is assigned to a response that fails to meet the minimum requirements.