Explains philosophical approaches to evaluation, and evaluates the evidence on which the explanation is based.
Shows the steps of the program evaluation process, and impartially considers any limitations associated with the steps.
Articulates an evaluation design, framework, or model for program improvement, and impartially considers any limitations associated with that selection.
Examines how data analysis can be used to foster ongoing program improvement, and identifies areas of uncertainty, knowledge gaps, or additional information that would be needed to gain a more complete understanding.
Writes clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics; and uses relevant evidence to support a central idea.