Your second discussion post is based on the readings, and may also be based on personal experiences. The post is worth a total of 15 points (10 points for your original post and 5 points for your response to classmates’ posts).
In an approximately 300-word post (can be longer if necessary), please respond to the following prompt:
According to your text, who are the 3 officials that make up the courtroom work group? Explain the significance/role of one of these members. What is a benefit of these members working together regularly? Based on what you may already know about the responsibilities of each member of the courtroom work group, which member of the courtroom plays the most important role (in your opinion)? Why?
As stated above, your original response to this discussion post should be based on the readings. It may also be based on your personal experiences. In addition, in your response to your classmates’ posts, you may attempt to fill in gaps (by commenting on something that your classmate failed to mention) or may include some personal experience that is relevant to their post. Please be sure NOT to copy and paste information from the internet as your discussion post.
Another possible response could be to agree or disagree with a classmate’s original post. For instance, you may think a different member of the courtroom work group plays a more important role. You can discuss why you agree or disagree (in your own words).
Do not simply compliment your classmate on his or her post, and tell him or her how much you enjoyed reading it. I will not give credit for responses written in that manner. The point of the response is to actually speak about/reply to the substance of your classmates’ posts.
Your response should be approximately 75 words.
NOTE: give it a topic
also for the classmate post, you can just write addition thoughts please indicate your initial post and the reply
Your first discussion post is based on the readings, and may also be based on personal experiences. The post is worth a total of 15 points (10 points for your original post and 5 points for your response).
Please respond to following prompt:
In an approximately 200-word response, answer the following questions: 1) Why do we need courts? 2) What purposes do they serve?
As stated above, your original response to this discussion post should be based on the readings. It may also be based on your personal experiences. Please be sure NOT to copy and paste information from the internet as your discussion post.
In addition, in your response to your classmates’ posts, you may attempt to fill in gaps (by commenting on something that your classmate failed to mention) or may include some personal experience that is relevant to their post. Do not simply compliment your classmate on his or her post, and tell him or her how much you enjoyed reading it. I will not give credit for responses written in that manner. The point of the response is to actually speak about/reply to the substance of your classmates’ posts.
Your response should be approximately 75 words.
In addition, pay attention to spelling, grammar, sentence structure, etc. Please proofread what you have written before posting it.
Please for the classmate comment, can you write that separately.
NOTE:
1. Siegel, Larry J., Schmalleger, Frank, and Worrall, John L. (3rd Edition). Courts and Criminal Justice in America. New York: Pearson. ISBN-10: 0-13-452669-4; ISBN-13: 978-0-13-452669-0