Your paper should be written in the form of an essay—the question is only divided up in order to clarify the main points you need to discuss in the essay.
Explain, in your own words, why FH might be thought to be a plausible candidate for the supreme principle of morality
Doing the same for Mill, explain in your own words why the utilitarian criteria of right and wrong might be thought to be a plausible candidate for the supreme principle of morality.
Kant offers several examples meant to illustrate how FH helps us understand why certain ways of treating others is morally wrong. Taking either his second example (making a promise you do not intend to keep) or his fourth example (the duty to aid others in need of assistance), explain in your own words how the example illustrates the value of FH for understanding the wrongness of the way of acting the example assumes is intuitively morally wrong.
How would Mill analyze the example you have just discussed?
Explain which analysis you find more plausible by identifying a respect in which one the analyses identifies a consideration you take to be morally important that the other does not. Be sure to offer reasons for taking this consideration to be important.