Feedback on notes Good start. Also consider: Strengths 1. Provides a good critical, comparative analysis of two theories which could be used to ex-plain how sustainable policies and experiments are likely to travel and transform the development regime. Weaknesses 2. The actual theory produced – mobile transitions theory – is unclear. 3. Limited explanation on how these two theories can be combined to create a new more use-ful theory. 4. Presumption that combining these theories is possible and likely to be effective. 5. The illustrative examples are not helpful. Important to consider: 1. How does this paper contribute to the discipline? Are its main conclusions original? 2. Does the evidence and reasoning adequately support the theory/theories presented? 3. Is the argument logically consistent? Convincing? 4. What does it mean for practice? a. Using examples of best practice to guide sustainable development in new contexts. b. The direct translation of sustainable experiments to new contexts. 5. What should those advising cities draw from this?